{"id":4188,"date":"2019-12-03T13:45:21","date_gmt":"2019-12-03T12:45:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/?p=4188"},"modified":"2019-12-15T18:39:48","modified_gmt":"2019-12-15T17:39:48","slug":"lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/","title":{"rendered":"L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l’antisionisme \u00e0 l’antis\u00e9mitisme"},"content":{"rendered":"
Publi\u00e9 sur\u00a0francetvinfo.fr<\/b><\/a><\/div>\n
\n

L’Assembl\u00e9e vote un texte \u00e9largissant la d\u00e9finition de l’antis\u00e9mitisme \u00e0 l’antisionisme<\/h3>\n

Le texte, sans valeur contraignante, a \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9 par seulement 154 voix pour, 72 contre, et 43 abstentions.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Comment d\u00e9finir\u00a0l’antis\u00e9mitisme<\/a>\u00a0? L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale a adopt\u00e9 mardi 3 d\u00e9cembre\u00a0une proposition de r\u00e9solution<\/a>\u00a0LREM soutenue par le gouvernement, mais qui a entra\u00een\u00e9 un record d’oppositions au sein de la majorit\u00e9, certains craignant qu’elle emp\u00eache toute critique de la politique d’Isra\u00ebl ou\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0hi\u00e9rarchise les haines\u00a0\u00bb.<\/em><\/p>\n

Le texte, sans valeur contraignante, a \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9 par seulement 154 voix pour (LREM et LR principalement), 72 contre (\u00e0 gauche), et 43 abstentions.\u00a0Vingt-six d\u00e9put\u00e9s LREM se sont prononc\u00e9s contre \u2013du jamais vu dans le groupe majoritaire depuis l’accord de libre \u00e9change Ceta (9 contre)\u2013, 22 se sont abstenus, tandis que 84 l’ont valid\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Une d\u00e9finition d\u00e9cri\u00e9e par des\u00a0intellectuels juifs<\/h3>\n

\u00ab\u00a0La haine n’a pas sa place en R\u00e9publique, l’intol\u00e9rance n’a pas sa place en France\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>, a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 dans l’h\u00e9micycle le ministre de l’Int\u00e9rieur, Christophe Castaner, faisant notamment r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la profanation le m\u00eame jour de\u00a0tombes juives<\/a>\u00a0dans un cimeti\u00e8re du Bas-Rhin.\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0Cette proposition de r\u00e9solution est une avanc\u00e9e dans notre lutte contre l’intol\u00e9rance\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>, a ajout\u00e9 le ministre, qui a aussi d\u00e9nonc\u00e9 dans son propos\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0les atteintes anti-chr\u00e9tiennes\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>\u00a0et\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0anti-musulmanes\u00a0\u00bb.<\/em><\/p>\n

Ce texte reprend la d\u00e9finition de l’antis\u00e9mitisme de l’Alliance internationale pour la m\u00e9moire de l’Holocauste (Ihra), valid\u00e9e par plusieurs pays et appuy\u00e9e par Emmanuel Macron en f\u00e9vrier devant le Conseil repr\u00e9sentatif des institutions juives de France (Crif). Le pr\u00e9sident de la R\u00e9publique\u00a0avait alors affirm\u00e9<\/a>\u00a0vouloir \u00e9largir la d\u00e9finition de l’antis\u00e9mitisme \u00e0 l’antisionisme.<\/p>\n

Une d\u00e9finition\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0hautement probl\u00e9matique\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>, a estim\u00e9 pour sa part un collectif de 127 intellectuels juifs du monde entier.\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0Nos opinions sur le sionisme peuvent \u00eatre diverses, mais nous pensons tous, y compris ceux qui se consid\u00e8rent comme sionistes, que cet amalgame est fondamentalement faux. Pour les nombreux juifs se consid\u00e9rant antisionistes, cet amalgame est profond\u00e9ment injurieux\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>, ont-il \u00e9crit dans une tribune publi\u00e9e dans\u00a0Le Monde<\/a>\u00a0(\u00e9dition abonn\u00e9s).<\/em><\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n
\u00ab\u00a0Nous vous prions de ne pas signer et de ne pas soutenir une r\u00e9solution qui assimile \u00e0 tort l\u2019antisionisme \u00e0 l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme.<\/strong><\/div>\n
\n

Appel de 125 universitaires juifs \u00e0 l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e Nationale<\/h3>\n

Le 3 d\u00e9cembre sera pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e nationale une r\u00e9solution LREM visant \u00e0 assimiler la critique du sionisme \u00e0 un acte antis\u00e9mite. La Commission nationale des droits de l\u2019homme a \u00e9crit \u00e0 chaque d\u00e9put\u00e9 pour les enjoindre de ne pas le voter. Et un \u00ab appel de 125 universitaires juifs \u00bb s\u2019est \u00e9galement adress\u00e9 aux d\u00e9put\u00e9s pour demander de ne signer ni voter ce texte<\/strong><\/p>\n

27 novembre 2019<\/p>\n

Mesdames, Messieurs les d\u00e9put\u00e9s,<\/p>\n

Nous, universitaires et intellectuels juifs, d\u2019Isra\u00ebl et d\u2019ailleurs, dont beaucoup sp\u00e9cialistes de l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme et de l\u2019histoire du juda\u00efsme et l\u2019Holocauste, vous \u00e9crivons dans la perspective de la proposition de r\u00e9solution visant \u00e0 lutter contre l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme que l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e Nationale a mise \u00e0 l\u2019ordre du jour des discussions pour d\u00e9bat et vote les 3 et 4 d\u00e9cembre prochains.<\/p>\n

Nous souhaitons exprimer notre vive pr\u00e9occupation concernant la mont\u00e9e de l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme dans le monde, y compris en France. Nous consid\u00e9rons l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme et toutes les autres formes de racisme et de x\u00e9nophobie comme une menace r\u00e9elle contre laquelle il convient de lutter avec la plus grande fermet\u00e9, et nous exhortons le gouvernement et le parlement fran\u00e7ais \u00e0 le faire.<\/p>\n

Tout en soulignant fermement cette pr\u00e9occupation, nous nous opposons \u00e0 la proposition de r\u00e9solution sur l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme pour deux raisons principales, et nous vous invitons \u00e0 ne pas apposer votre signature et \u00e0 ne pas lui accorder votre soutien.<\/p>\n

Premi\u00e8rement, l\u2019expos\u00e9 des motifs de la proposition de r\u00e9solution associe l\u2019antisionisme \u00e0 l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme. Il assimile m\u00eame l\u2019antisionisme \u00e0 l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme en pr\u00e9cisant que \u00ab critiquer l\u2019existence m\u00eame d\u2019Isra\u00ebl en ce qu\u2019elle constitue une collectivit\u00e9 compos\u00e9e de citoyens juifs revient \u00e0 exprimer une haine \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de la communaut\u00e9\u0301 juive dans son ensemble \u00bb.<\/p>\n

Avant de poursuivre notre argumentation, nous d\u00e9plorons que l\u2019expos\u00e9 des motifs d\u00e9signe Isra\u00ebl comme \u201cune collectivit\u00e9 compos\u00e9e de citoyens juifs \u00bb. Environ 20 pour cent de la population d\u2019Isra\u00ebl sont des citoyens palestiniens, dont la plupart sont musulmans et chr\u00e9tiens. La d\u00e9signation choisie occulte et nie leur existence. Nous consid\u00e9rons cette approche comme hautement probl\u00e9matique, compte tenu \u00e9galement de l\u2019engagement de votre pays en faveur d\u2019une d\u00e9finition de la citoyennet\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise qui n\u2019est pas bas\u00e9e sur l\u2019ethnicit\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Nos opinions sur le sionisme peuvent \u00eatre diverses, mais nous pensons tous, y compris ceux qui se consid\u00e8rent comme sionistes, que l\u2019association de l\u2019antisionisme et de l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme est fondamentalement faux. Pour les nombreux juifs se consid\u00e9rant antisionistes, cet amalgame est profond\u00e9ment injurieux.<\/p>\n

L\u2019antisionisme est un point de vue l\u00e9gitime dans l\u2019histoire juive, et il a une longue tradition, y compris en Isra\u00ebl. Certains Juifs s\u2019opposent au sionisme pour des raisons religieuses, d\u2019autres pour des raisons politiques ou culturelles. De nombreuses victimes de l\u2019Holocauste \u00e9taient antisionistes. Le projet de r\u00e9solution les d\u00e9shonore et offense leur m\u00e9moire, en les consid\u00e9rant r\u00e9troactivement comme antis\u00e9mites.<\/p>\n

Pour les Palestiniens, le sionisme repr\u00e9sente la d\u00e9possession, le d\u00e9placement, l\u2019occupation et les in\u00e9galit\u00e9s structurelles. Il est cynique de les stigmatiser comme antis\u00e9mites parce qu\u2019ils s\u2019opposent au sionisme. Ils s\u2019opposent au sionisme non par haine des Juifs, mais parce qu\u2019ils vivent le sionisme comme un mouvement politique oppressif. Agir ainsi t\u00e9moigne d\u2019une grande insensibilit\u00e9 et d\u2019une politique de deux poids, deux mesures, sachant qu\u2019Isra\u00ebl nie le droit de la Palestine \u00e0 exister et mine son existence m\u00eame.<\/p>\n

Il n\u2019y a aucun doute qu\u2019il existe des antis\u00e9mites parmi les gens qui s\u2019opposent au sionisme. Mais il y a \u00e9galement beaucoup d\u2019antis\u00e9mites qui soutiennent le sionisme. Il est donc inappropri\u00e9 et totalement inexact d\u2019identifier de mani\u00e8re g\u00e9n\u00e9rale antis\u00e9mitisme et antisionisme. En confondant ces deux ph\u00e9nom\u00e8nes, l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e nationale compromettrait les efforts vitaux de lutte contre le v\u00e9ritable antis\u00e9mitisme, qui est multidimensionnel et provient de diff\u00e9rents secteurs de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise.<\/p>\n

Notre seconde objection est que la r\u00e9solution approuve la \u00ab d\u00e9finition op\u00e9rationnelle \u00bb de l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme de l\u2019Alliance internationale pour la m\u00e9moire de l\u2019Holocauste (IHRA). Cette d\u00e9finition est hautement probl\u00e9matique. La r\u00e9solution pr\u00e9tend que la d\u00e9finition \u00ab permet de d\u00e9signer le plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment possible ce qu\u2019est l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme contemporain \u00bb. En r\u00e9alit\u00e9 cependant, la d\u00e9finition est peu claire et impr\u00e9cise et, par cons\u00e9quent, n\u2019est pas un instrument efficace de lutte contre l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme. D\u2019autre part, une l\u00e9gislation visant \u00e0 lutter efficacement contre l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme et \u00e0 le poursuivre existe d\u00e9j\u00e0 en France.<\/p>\n

L\u2019expos\u00e9 des motifs de la proposition de r\u00e9solution indique que la d\u00e9finition de l\u2019IHRA \u00ab ne reconna\u00eet pas comme antis\u00e9mite la critique des politiques de l\u2019\u00c9tat d\u2019Isra\u00ebl \u00bb. En r\u00e9alit\u00e9 cependant, plusieurs \u00ab exemples contemporains d\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme \u00bb ont \u00e9t\u00e9 joints \u00e0 la d\u00e9finition, qui assimilent intentionnellement la critique et l\u2019opposition aux politiques de l\u2019\u00c9tat d\u2019Isra\u00ebl \u00e0 l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme. Ces exemples sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s et consid\u00e9r\u00e9s comme partie int\u00e9grante de la d\u00e9finition.<\/p>\n

D\u2019apr\u00e8s les exemples et la mani\u00e8re dont ils sont appliqu\u00e9s, il suffit de critiquer Isra\u00ebl d\u2019une mani\u00e8re per\u00e7ue comme diff\u00e9rente de ce qui se fait pour d\u2019autres pays, pour \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 antis\u00e9mite. Il suffit d\u2019\u00eatre en faveur d\u2019une solution binationale ou d\u00e9mocratique au conflit isra\u00e9lo-palestinien, pour \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme antis\u00e9mite. Il en va de m\u00eame, quand on bl\u00e2me Isra\u00ebl pour son racisme institutionnalis\u00e9. On peut certainement ne pas \u00eatre d\u2019accord avec ces \u00e9nonc\u00e9s. Mais ces opinions sont consid\u00e9r\u00e9es comme l\u00e9gitimes et prot\u00e9g\u00e9es par la libert\u00e9 d\u2019expression dans tout autre contexte politique. Ainsi, la r\u00e9solution cr\u00e9e un double standard injustifiable en faveur d\u2019Isra\u00ebl et contre les Palestiniens.<\/p>\n

La d\u00e9finition de l\u2019IHRA est d\u00e9j\u00e0 utilis\u00e9e pour stigmatiser et r\u00e9duire au silence les critiques de l\u2019\u00c9tat d\u2019Isra\u00ebl, notamment les organisations de d\u00e9fense des droits humains et des experts respect\u00e9s. Cette situation a \u00e9t\u00e9 condamn\u00e9e par d\u2019\u00e9minents sp\u00e9cialistes de l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme. Kenneth Stern, l\u2019un des r\u00e9dacteurs originaux de la d\u00e9finition de l\u2019IHRA, a \u00e9galement mis en garde contre l\u2019utilisation de cette d\u00e9finition pour saper la libert\u00e9 d\u2019expression.<\/p>\n

La question cl\u00e9 est la suivante: pourquoi tout cela se produit-il ? Nous ne pouvons pas consid\u00e9rer cela comme d\u00e9connect\u00e9 de l\u2019agenda politique principal du gouvernement isra\u00e9lien visant \u00e0 enraciner son occupation et son annexion de la Palestine et \u00e0 faire taire toute critique \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de cet agenda.<\/p>\n

Depuis des ann\u00e9es, le gouvernement isra\u00e9lien du Premier ministre Benjamin Netanyahu d\u00e9nonce comme antis\u00e9mite toute opposition \u00e0 sa politique. Netanyahu lui-m\u00eame a d\u00e9fendu avec force l\u2019\u00e9quivalence de l\u2019antisionisme et de l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme, ainsi que la d\u00e9finition de l\u2019IHRA. Cela illustre la mani\u00e8re dont la lutte contre l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme a \u00e9t\u00e9 instrumentalis\u00e9e pour prot\u00e9ger le gouvernement isra\u00e9lien.<\/p>\n

C\u2019est avec inqui\u00e9tude que nous constatons que ces efforts du gouvernement isra\u00e9lien trouvent un soutien politique, jusqu\u2019en France. Le 28 mai 2019, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 Sylvain Maillard avait particip\u00e9 \u00e0 une conf\u00e9rence aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s de Yossi Dagan, un leader militant des colons, qui pr\u00e9side une autorit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00c9tat Isra\u00e9lien en charge des colonies en Cisjordanie occup\u00e9e. Comme vous le savez, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 Maillard a initi\u00e9 la r\u00e9solution en pr\u00e9sence sur l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme, quelques jours avant cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement.<\/p>\n

Nous vous demandons donc de lutter contre l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme et contre toutes les formes de racisme, mais sans aider le gouvernement isra\u00e9lien dans son programme d\u2019occupation et d\u2019annexion.<\/p>\n

Cette proposition de r\u00e9solution n\u2019est pas un moyen cr\u00e9dible et efficace d\u2019y parvenir. L\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme doit \u00eatre combattu sur des bases universelles, au m\u00eame titre que d\u2019autres formes de racisme et de x\u00e9nophobie, pour lutter contre la haine. L\u2019abandon de cette approche universaliste conduira \u00e0 une polarisation accrue en France, ce qui nuirait \u00e9galement \u00e0 la lutte contre l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme.<\/p>\n

Dans ce contexte, nous notons que la proposition de r\u00e9solution est \u00e9galement en contradiction avec la position de la CNCDH, la Commission nationale consultative des droits de l\u2019homme. Dans son rapport de 2018 sur la lutte contre le racisme, la CNCDH a averti que la d\u00e9finition de l\u2019IHRA risque d\u2019affaiblir l\u2019approche universelle fran\u00e7aise de la lutte contre le racisme et a insist\u00e9 \u00ab sur la vigilance pour ne pas confondre racisme et critique l\u00e9gitime d\u2019un \u00c9tat et de sa politique \u00bb.<\/p>\n

Nous vous prions de ne pas signer et de ne pas soutenir une r\u00e9solution qui assimile \u00e0 tort l\u2019antisionisme \u00e0 l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme. Ne signez pas et ne soutenez pas une r\u00e9solution qui approuve la d\u00e9finition politis\u00e9 de l\u2019antis\u00e9mitisme de l\u2019IHRA, d\u2019autant plus si elle le fait sans se distancier des exemples probl\u00e9matiques de la d\u00e9finition qui concernent Isra\u00ebl.<\/strong>
\nNous vous prions d\u2019accepter, Mesdames, Messieurs les d\u00e9put\u00e9s, l\u2019expression de nos sentiments distingu\u00e9s.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Prof. Howard Tzvi Adelman, Associate Professor of History and of Jewish History,
\nQueen\u2019s University, Kingston, Ontario
\nDr. Karin Adelman, physician
\nProf. Ofer Aharony, Faculty of Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science
\nProf. (emeritus) Mateo Alaluf, Institute of Sociology, Universit\u00e9 Libre de Bruxelles
\nProf. Gadi Algazi, Professor of Medieval History, Department of History, Tel Aviv University; associate fellow at Re:Work: International Research Center Work and Human Lifecycle in Global History at Humboldt University, Berlin
\nDr. Hila Amit, writer, researcher
\nProf. Gil Anidjar, Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies Department, Columbia University
\nDr. Seth Anziska, Department of Hebrew and Jewish Studies, University College London
\nProf. Yonathan Anson, Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
\nProf. Jean-Christophe Attias, Professor and Chair of Medieval Jewish Thought, \u00c9cole pratique des hautes \u00e9tudes, Universit\u00e9 PSL, Paris
\nProf. (emerita) Elsa Auerbach, English Department, University of Massachusetts Boston (daughter of German Holocaust refugees)
\nProf. (emeritus) Joel Beinin, Donald J. McLachlan Professor of History and Professor of Middle East History, Stanford University,
\nProf. Avner Ben-Amos, Department of History, Tel Aviv University
\nDr. Ayelet Ben-Yishai, Department of English Language, University of Haifa
\nProf. Andrew Stuart Bergerson, History Department, University of Missouri-Kansas City
\nProf. Michael Berkowitz, Professor of Modern Jewish History, Department of Hebrew and
\nJewish Studies, University College London
\nProf. Louise Bethlehem, English and Cultural Studies, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
\nProf. David Blanc, Department of Mathematics, University of Haifa
\nProf. Daniel D. Blatman, Head of Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, Max and Rita Haber Chair in Contemporary Jewry and Holocaust Studies, The Hebrew University Jerusalem
\nProf. Hagit Borer, Fellow of the British Academy; Fellow of the Linguistics Society of America; Chair in Linguistics, SLLF, Queen Mary University of London
\nProf. Daniel Boyarin, Taubman Professor of Talmudic Culture, University of California at Berkeley, Fellow American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Von Humboldt Senior Laureate
\nDr. Rony Brauman, physician, Professor at University of Manchester
\nProf. (emeritus) Jose Brunner, Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas and Buchmann Faculty of Law, Director, Eva & Marc Besen Institute for the Study
\nof Historical Consciousness, co-founder of Israel\u2019s first legal clinic for the rights of Holocaust survivors, Tel Aviv University
\nProf. Judith Butler, Maxine Elliot Professor of Comparative Literature and Critical Theory,
\nUniversity of California, Berkeley
\nProf. (emerita) Jane Caplan, Professor of Modern European History, University of Oxford; Emeritus Fellow, St Antony\u2019s College, Oxford; Marjorie Walter Goodhart Professor
\nEmeritus of European History, Bryn Mawr College; Visiting Professor, Birkbeck, University of London
\nDr. Nina Caputo, Associate Professor, Department of History, University of Florida
\nProf. Michael Chanan, Professor of Film and Video, University of Roehampton, London
\nProf. Stephen Clingman, Distinguished University Professor, Department of English, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
\nDr. Eyal Clyne, unaffiliated
\nProf. James Cohen, Institut du monde anglophone, University of Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3
\nProf. Alon Confino, Pen Tishkach Chair of Holocaust Studies, Director of The Institute for Holocaust, Genocide and Memory Studies, Department of History, University of Massachusetts
\nMike Cushman, research fellow, London School of Economics and Political Science
\nDr. Hilla Dayan, Department of Sociology, Amsterdam University College
\nProf. (emerita) Sonia Dayan-Herzbrun, Faculty of Social Sciences, University Paris Diderot Paris 7
\nProf. Sidra DeKoven Ezrahi, Professor of Comparative Literature, Hebrew University of
\nJerusalem
\nDr. Tal Dor, adjunct researcher, Experice, Universit\u00e9 Paris 8
\nProf. (emeritus) Tommy Dreyfus, Mathematics Education, School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Awardee of the Felix Klein Medal
\nProf. David Enoch, Faculty of Law and Department of Philosophy, Hebrew University of
\nJerusalem
\nProf. (emerita) Judith Ferster, English Department, North Carolina State University
\nDr. Cynthia Franklin, Department of English, University of Hawaii
\nProf. (emeritus) Gideon Freudenthal, The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University
\nProf. (emeritus) Chaim Gans, Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University
\nProf. Amos Goldberg, Department of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
\nKatharina Galor, Hirschfeld Visiting Associate Professor, Program in Judaic Studies, Brown University
\nProf. Shai Ginsburg, Department of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, Duke University
\nProf. Rachel Giora, Department of Linguistics, Tel Aviv University
\nProf. (emeritus) Steve Golin, History Department, Bloomfield College
\nProf. Neve Gordon, Department of Politics and Government, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
\nProf. Joel Gordon, The Department of History, University of Arkansas Fayetteville
\nProf. Nir Gov, Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science
\nDr. Yann Guillaud, lecturer at Sciences Po and the Catholic University of Paris
\nDr. G\u00e9rard Haddad, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, writer
\nDr. Ilana Hammerman, writer, winner of the Yeshayahu Leibowitz Prize (2015)
\nProf. David Harel, Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, The Weizmann Institute of Science; winner of the Israel Prize (2004) and of the EMET prize
\nProf. Elizabeth Heineman, Department of History, University of Iowa
\nDr. Shir Hever, Political Science, Free University of Berlin
\nProf. Eva Jablonka, Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University
\nMichal Kaiser-Livne, psychoanalyst, Berlin Institute for Group Analysis
\nDr. Brian Klug, senior research fellow and tutor in Philosophy, University of Oxford, honorary fellow of the Parkes Institute for the Study of Jewish\/non-Jewish Relations, University of Southampton
\nProf. (emeritus) Yehoshua Kolodny, Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of
\nJerusalem, winner of the Israel Prize (2009)
\nDr. Hubert Krivine, physician
\nPascal Lederer, physician, honorary research director at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)
\nProf. (emeritus) Micah Leshem, Department of Psychology, University of Haifa
\nDr. Les Levidow, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The Open University, United Kingdom
\nDr. Mark Levene, emeritus fellow, Department of History, University of Southampton UK; Parkes Centre for Jewish\/non-Jewish Relations; winner of the Institute for the Study of Genocide, New York; Lemkin prize (2015)
\nProf. Joseph Levine, Professor of Philosophy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
\nDr. R. Ruth Linden, President Tree of Life Health Advocates, San Francisco; founder of the Holocaust Media Project
\nAdi Liraz, interdisciplinary artist, instructor relating to the history of Jews in Greece and in
\nGermany
\nDr. Rachel Livne-Freudenthal, Leo Baeck Institute, Jerusalem
\nProf. (emeritus) Mosh\u00e9 Machover, Professor of Philosophy, University of London
\nJo\u00eblle Marelli, independent scholar, former program director at the College International de Philosophie, Paris
\nDr. Anat Matar, Philosophy Department, Tel Aviv University
\nDr. Yehoshua Mathias, senior lecturer, School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
\nProf. David Mednicoff, Associate Professor of Middle Eastern Studies and Public Policy,
\nUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst
\nDr. Oded Na\u2019aman, The Martin Buber Society of Fellows, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
\nDr. Sheryl Nestel, independent scholar
\nProf. Isaac Nevo, Associate Professor, Philosophy
\nProf. (emerita) Benita Parry, English and Comparative Literary Studies, Warwick
\nUniversity
\nHadas Pe\u2019ery, lecturer at the The Buchmann Mehta School of Music, Tel Aviv University;
\nlaureate of the Israeli Prime Minister\u2019s Award for Composers
\nProf. Nurit Peled-Elhanan, School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; The
\nDavid Yellin Academic College of Education; co-winner of the Sakharov Prize (2001)
\nProf. (emeritus) Roland Pfefferkorn, Professor of Sociology, University of Strasbourg
\nDr. Yael Politi, Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universit\u00e4t Dresden
\nDr. David Ranan, Birkbeck University, London
\nProf. (emerita) Ada Rapoport-Albert, Professor of Hebrew and Jewish Studies, University College London
\nBen Ratskoff, University of California, Los Angeles
\nProf. (emerita) Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan, Departments of English Literature and Comparative Literature, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; member of the Israel Academy of
\nSciences and Humanities
\nDr. Noa Roei, Assistant Professor, Literary and Cultural Analysis, University of Amsterdam
\nProf. (emerita) Lisa Rofel, University of California, Santa Cruz
\nProf. Dana Ron, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University
\nProf. (emeritus) Steven Rose, Professor of Biology and Neurobiology, The Open University, United Kingdom
\nProf. (emeritus) Jonathan Rosenhead, Professor of Operational Research, Department of
\nManagement, London School of Economics and Political Science
\nProf. David M. Rosenthal, Cognitive Science Concentration Graduate Center, City
\nUniversity of New York
\nProf. Michael Rothberg, 1939 Society Samuel Goetz Chair in Holocaust Studies, Department of Comparative Literature, University of California; specializes in Holocaust studies
\nDr. E. Natalie Rothman, Department of Historical and Cultural Studies, University of Toronto Scarborough
\nProf. Catherine Rottenberg, Department of American and Canadian Studies, University of Nottingham
\nDr. Sara Roy, Senior Research Scholar, Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Harvard University
\nDr. Hannah Safran, Haifa Feminist Research Center
\nDr. Ariel Salzmann, Department of History, Queen\u2019s University, Ontario
\nCatherine Samary, economist (ret.), Paris Dauphine University
\nProf. (emeritus) Donald Sassoon, Professor of Comparative European History, Queen Mary, University of London
\nProf. (emerita) Naomi Scheman, Philosophy and Gender, Women, & Sexuality Studies,
\nUniversity of Minnesota
\nSir Stephen Sedley, former Lord Justice of Appeal, England and Wales; former UK Judge
\nad hoc at European Court of Human Rights; former visiting professor of law, Oxford University
\nProf. (emeritus) Graeme Segal, Mathematics, All Souls College
\nProf. Gershon Shafir, Department of Sociology, University of California, San Diego
\nProf. (emerita) Alice Shalvi, English Departments, Hebrew University Jerusalem and Ben- Gurion University of the Negev; former Rector Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies; winner of the Israel Prize (2007), co-winner of the Leibowitz Prize (2009), winner of the Bonei Zion Prize (2017)
\nDr. Dimitry Shevchenko, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Asian Studies, The
\nHebrew University, Jerusalem
\nProf. (emeritus) Avi Shlaim, Department of Politics and International Relations, St.
\nAntony\u2019s College and University of Oxford; Fellow of the British Academy
\nProf. David Shulman, Department of Asian Studies, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, member Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, winner of the EMET Prize (2010) and of the Israel Prize (2016)
\nDr. Dmitry Shumsky, Department of Jewish history and Head of the Cherrick Center for the Study of Zionism, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
\nRobert Yerachmiel Sniderman, Simon Fraser University
\nDr. Lisa Stampnitzky, lecturer in Politics, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Sheffield
\nProf. Marc Steinling, physician, biophysicist, honorary Professor of Universities (son of French resistants FTP-MOI)
\nProf. Sacha Stern, Head of Department, Hebrew and Jewish Studies, University College London
\nProf. (emeritus) Zeev Sternhell, L\u00e9on Blum Professor emeritus, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Israel Prize Laureate in Political Science; Member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Letters; International Honorary member American Academy of Arts and Sciences
\nHoward Rechavia Taylor, Columbia University
\nProf. Barry Trachtenberg, Michael R. and Deborah K. Rubin Presidential Chair of Jewish History, Department of History, Wake Forest University
\nProf. (emeritus) Rolf Verleger, psychologist, member of the Central Council of Jews in
\nGermany 2005-2009
\nDominique Vidal, historian and journalists
\nProf. Roy Wagner, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Z\u00fcrich
\nDr. Yair Wallach, Head of the Centre for Jewish Studies, Department of the\u00a0Languages and Cultures of the Near and Middle East, SOAS, University of London
\nDaphna Westerman, MA Fine Arts Bauhaus-University, Weimar
\nProf. Diane L. Wolf, Department of Sociology, University of California, Davis
\nProf. (emeritus) Niza Yanay, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev,
\nProf. (emeritus) Moshe Zimmermann, former director of the Richard Koebner Minerva Center for German History, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Prof. (emeritus) Moshe Zuckermann, The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Publi\u00e9 sur\u00a0francetvinfo.fr L’Assembl\u00e9e vote un texte \u00e9largissant la d\u00e9finition de l’antis\u00e9mitisme \u00e0 l’antisionisme Le texte, sans valeur contraignante, a \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9 par seulement 154 voix pour, 72 contre, et 43 abstentions. Comment d\u00e9finir\u00a0l’antis\u00e9mitisme\u00a0? L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale a adopt\u00e9 mardi 3 d\u00e9cembre\u00a0une proposition de r\u00e9solution\u00a0LREM soutenue par le gouvernement, mais qui a entra\u00een\u00e9 un record d’oppositions au … Continuer la lecture de « L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l’antisionisme \u00e0 l’antis\u00e9mitisme »<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":115,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ldh"],"yoast_head":"\nL'Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l'antisionisme \u00e0 l'antis\u00e9mitisme -<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"L'Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l'antisionisme \u00e0 l'antis\u00e9mitisme -\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Publi\u00e9 sur\u00a0francetvinfo.fr L’Assembl\u00e9e vote un texte \u00e9largissant la d\u00e9finition de l’antis\u00e9mitisme \u00e0 l’antisionisme Le texte, sans valeur contraignante, a \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9 par seulement 154 voix pour, 72 contre, et 43 abstentions. Comment d\u00e9finir\u00a0l’antis\u00e9mitisme\u00a0? L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale a adopt\u00e9 mardi 3 d\u00e9cembre\u00a0une proposition de r\u00e9solution\u00a0LREM soutenue par le gouvernement, mais qui a entra\u00een\u00e9 un record d’oppositions au … Continuer la lecture de « L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l’antisionisme \u00e0 l’antis\u00e9mitisme »\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LDH66-100998292034084\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-03T12:45:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-12-15T17:39:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/files\/2020\/03\/logo-LDH-66.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"225\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"225\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ldh66\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ldh66\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ldh66\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#\/schema\/person\/d09025899bffb2ef3d4fa4b9fbc4afa8\"},\"headline\":\"L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l’antisionisme \u00e0 l’antis\u00e9mitisme\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-03T12:45:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-15T17:39:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/\"},\"wordCount\":3837,\"articleSection\":[\"LDH\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/\",\"name\":\"L'Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l'antisionisme \u00e0 l'antis\u00e9mitisme -\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-03T12:45:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-15T17:39:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#\/schema\/person\/d09025899bffb2ef3d4fa4b9fbc4afa8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/\",\"name\":\"\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#\/schema\/person\/d09025899bffb2ef3d4fa4b9fbc4afa8\",\"name\":\"ldh66\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0c2209a27eeed5e746fea8ab64975a95?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0c2209a27eeed5e746fea8ab64975a95?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"ldh66\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/author\/ldh66\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"L'Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l'antisionisme \u00e0 l'antis\u00e9mitisme -","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"L'Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l'antisionisme \u00e0 l'antis\u00e9mitisme -","og_description":"Publi\u00e9 sur\u00a0francetvinfo.fr L’Assembl\u00e9e vote un texte \u00e9largissant la d\u00e9finition de l’antis\u00e9mitisme \u00e0 l’antisionisme Le texte, sans valeur contraignante, a \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9 par seulement 154 voix pour, 72 contre, et 43 abstentions. Comment d\u00e9finir\u00a0l’antis\u00e9mitisme\u00a0? L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale a adopt\u00e9 mardi 3 d\u00e9cembre\u00a0une proposition de r\u00e9solution\u00a0LREM soutenue par le gouvernement, mais qui a entra\u00een\u00e9 un record d’oppositions au … Continuer la lecture de « L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l’antisionisme \u00e0 l’antis\u00e9mitisme »","og_url":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LDH66-100998292034084","article_published_time":"2019-12-03T12:45:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-12-15T17:39:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":225,"height":225,"url":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/files\/2020\/03\/logo-LDH-66.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"ldh66","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"ldh66","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/"},"author":{"name":"ldh66","@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#\/schema\/person\/d09025899bffb2ef3d4fa4b9fbc4afa8"},"headline":"L’Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l’antisionisme \u00e0 l’antis\u00e9mitisme","datePublished":"2019-12-03T12:45:21+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-15T17:39:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/"},"wordCount":3837,"articleSection":["LDH"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/","url":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/","name":"L'Assembl\u00e9e nationale vote un texte qui assimile l'antisionisme \u00e0 l'antis\u00e9mitisme -","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-03T12:45:21+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-15T17:39:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#\/schema\/person\/d09025899bffb2ef3d4fa4b9fbc4afa8"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/lassemblee-nationale-vote-texte-assimile-lantisionisme-a-lantisemitisme\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#website","url":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/","name":"","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#\/schema\/person\/d09025899bffb2ef3d4fa4b9fbc4afa8","name":"ldh66","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0c2209a27eeed5e746fea8ab64975a95?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0c2209a27eeed5e746fea8ab64975a95?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"ldh66"},"url":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/author\/ldh66\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/115"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4188"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4188\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4190,"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4188\/revisions\/4190"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/site.ldh-france.org\/ldh66\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}